🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts said the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be used for training AI models.

“Training on pirated material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.