🔗 Share this article

During last year's race for the White House, the former president courted the electorate with promises to reduce costs immediately upon taking office. But, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay minimal attention to affordability issues. All that changed following inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled campaign to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative has proven a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Claims and Supermarket Truth

Just two days after the election, Trump kicked off his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Our groceries are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from billionaire Trump—often associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their concerns as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices was highly misleading and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing costs? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in five of the six food categories monitored by the Consumer Price Index, such as animal proteins (rising over 4%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Claims

Despite the evidence, the president continues to push his big lie about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks contradict the fact that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, Trump claimed that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, despite government figures indicate they average $3.19.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. Many voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of decreases. As a result, aides suggested one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Possible Impact

As certain taxes being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, the administration will likely claim that he has cut prices once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist taking credit for putting out a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “this is the peak period of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while only 26% consider them positive. Another poll found that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Suggested Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s top economic official, recently contradicted claims of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and shed approximately 33,000 jobs since January. Citing this weakness, the secretary called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to widespread concern about affordability, the president proposed a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea could increase federal spending, push up interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into the economy.

Another proposed solution for affordability centered on creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—frequently reducing them by a small amount each month. The drawback is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and slow building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Financial Prospects

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as increasing costs. Officials claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” This is unfounded and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, the current administration’s actions—especially import taxes—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the nation could face a widespread recession. In downturns, people generally possess less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to hold down prices, his primary method for improving living standards might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.